有個網(wǎng)民如是說,其經(jīng)驗比較完整,供大家參考:
3}4p_}f/[4 uyNJN http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 A)z PaXZ d;~ 3P
Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
%)axGbZG; 0zbLc% I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
T;!ukGoFP JA)o@[l F The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
T^$g N| available, but more difficult to use.
